![]() I’d love to find out if there are other plans to add support for Firefox and Opera. YouTube and Vimeo seem to have discounted Ogg. Google, on the other hand, which owns YouTube has said that Theora is not a good enough codec, claiming “If were to switch to theora and maintain even a semblance of the current youtube quality it would take up most available bandwidth across the Internet”, a claim hotly (and convincingly) contested in Greg Maxwell’s YouTube / Ogg/Theora comparison. Silivia Pfeiffer (a contractor for Mozilla) claims that serving as Ogg Theora will reach more people than serving as H264. ) It also seems that people creating H.264 content will be liable for royalties starting in 2011.įar be it from me to get into the ins and outs of the debate over which codec to use, but it seems that open source would be the better way to go. By contrast, support for native H.264 decoding in a browser costs approximately $5 million per year. ![]() Why use Ogg?Īs previously stated, Ogg is an open source codec, meaning it’s free to use and implement. It’s a shame these browsers aren’t supported, especially since Firefox 3.6 was released last week and announced support for full-screen video in its native video player. There’s one major problem here: Ogg Theora, the open source video codec supported by both Firefox and Opera, is not supported on either site. Kamagra from india The elephant in the room Who knows which side of the fence Microsoft will come down on, but I feel duty bound to mention that the licensors of the H.264 codec include both. Opera and Mozilla use the Ogg Theora codec (more on that later), while Apple and Google use H.264. Since no official codec is defined in the spec because browser manufacturers have chosen to use different codecs to render HTML5 video. If you’re using a browser that doesn’t support HTML5 video it will default back to the Flash method they currently employ.īoth YouTube and Vimeo use the H.264 codec to encode the videos - and that’s where things start to get complicated. They’ll also work in IE if you have ChromeFrame installed (which we all know is cheating). The videos will work natively in Safari and Chrome (well, YouTube would certainly have to, wouldn’t it?). Two blog posts published last week announced that the two major players in online video are experimenting with the HTML5 element. Now it should play without any issues.Unless you’ve been hiding under an XHTML2 shaped rock for the past week or so, you’ll know that both YouTube and Vimeo have announced plans to support the HTML5 video element. Now open some HTML5 video from YouTube that did not play initially. Double click it to change its value to true. You will see the parameter which is set to false. ![]() Type the word: "mediasource" (without quotes) in the filter text box.Click "I'll be careful, I promise!" to continue to the about:config page. Note: A warning page may appear that says "This might void your warranty!". Open the Firefox browser and type the following in the address bar: about:config.If you prefer HTML5 videos over the Adobe Flash Player, you might want to enable Media Source Extensions to get advanced support of HTML5 videos in Firefox. By default, this option is off in Firefox, so the browser is not able to play some HTML5 video streams. Those videos require the Media Source Extensions feature which is disabled by default in Firefox. It supports the required HTMLVideoElement, but some videos do not play anyway. While Mozilla Firefox has good support for HTML5 standards, you might have noticed that it does not support all features required to play videos on YouTube without having Adobe Flash Player installed. RЕCOMMENDED: Click here to fix Windоws issues and optimize system performance ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |